|
Post by bloodyjennifer on Aug 30, 2008 0:30:32 GMT -5
I don't know about TAMARA 2. TAMARA itself kind of had a thin story as is.
|
|
|
Post by Just a Horror Fan on Aug 30, 2008 11:07:18 GMT -5
They could also get a real ugly girl this time. I didn't buy in the first movie, that Tamara was this ugly girl no one liked. And it didn't matter how many pairs of glasses, sweaters, etc. they tried to bury her under. I completely agree. The movie was cliched and unrealistic. And dumb. Tamara was awful. So I totally welcome a sequel. Wow what a contradiction. #confused0027# Nothing contradicting about it! Good movies don't need sequels. But with bad movies... a sequel can do anything it wants to.
|
|
|
Post by Mr.HoRrOr on Sept 4, 2008 12:57:40 GMT -5
The problem with making a sequel to bad movies is after part one, who'd dare turn out for two?
|
|
|
Post by cloverfieldb00 on Oct 1, 2008 14:08:17 GMT -5
'Tamara 2' couldn't hurt. Not sure if Jenna would do it though.
|
|
|
Post by judyshouseofwax on Nov 19, 2008 15:12:41 GMT -5
I think she would if they casted Channing Tatum as her new target.
|
|