|
Post by Slasherfan on Oct 22, 2008 18:55:14 GMT -5
So who here would like a sequel to "Teeth" made eventually? I think a sequel would be fine if they could come up with a new story.
|
|
|
Post by Dead2night on Oct 23, 2008 19:20:19 GMT -5
I have t say I'm shocked ANY guy would be intrigued by a sequel to this movie. But no I doubt there'll be one. It'd be too weird, and it's really an indie film that gained a strange cult following due to it's outrageousness. A sequel would if anything, cheapen it.
|
|
|
Post by gh0st on Oct 26, 2008 15:01:44 GMT -5
Now why would anyone go and make a sequel to a movie like "Teeth"? It would just be wrong, and pointless.
|
|
|
Post by cloverfieldb00 on Oct 31, 2008 13:54:58 GMT -5
'Teeth 2'? No teethin' way! ;D
|
|
|
Post by dawolf on Nov 5, 2008 12:18:02 GMT -5
A sequel to tEETH would be just weird.
|
|
|
Post by Dead2night on Nov 8, 2008 2:37:58 GMT -5
Now why would anyone go and make a sequel to a movie like "Teeth"? It would just be wrong, and pointless. How would it be wrong? Pointless maybe but wrong?
|
|
|
Post by elmstreetnightmare on Nov 18, 2008 17:11:07 GMT -5
Films like 'Teeth' never get sequels. They're made for once in a lifetime shock value. Then the cast and director fade into obscurity for a few years.
Elm Street Nightmare
|
|
|
Post by cholo on Nov 22, 2008 19:16:27 GMT -5
Teeth 2? LOL! Someone needs a hobby.
|
|
|
Post by iamlegendary on Dec 7, 2008 18:46:15 GMT -5
"Teeth 2" would be an exercise in futility. There's no story to continue.
|
|
|
Post by darkdayzahead on Mar 17, 2009 15:48:48 GMT -5
No thanks. 'Teeth' was enough.
|
|