|
|
Post by ravendjinn on Apr 9, 2006 22:16:26 GMT -5
hey i've got this friend who wants to know if there will be a sequel, hes sure there is but he wants to know if it is true that its getting a R18+ rating cos of the gore? hail satan!
|
|
|
|
Post by entrails on Apr 10, 2006 15:50:59 GMT -5
"Ghost Ship" was a cool ass movie but I think it's best left as it is with Ferriman winning in the end.
|
|
|
|
Post by darkdayzahead on Apr 19, 2006 16:31:08 GMT -5
hey i've got this friend who wants to know if there will be a sequel, hes sure there is but he wants to know if it is true that its getting a R18+ rating cos of the gore? hail satan! There will never be a sequel to 'Ghost Ship' for a number of reasons. Dark Castle has a no sequel policy and second 'Ghost Ship' didn't make a ton of money. |
|
|
|
Post by Dead2night on Apr 20, 2006 16:56:30 GMT -5
I don't know. I remember thinking that I really liked the movie the first time I saw it but going over it a second time I found that it was really empty. Maybe it was just the kills that got me the first time (the wire gag at the beginning was just fucking genius). So what would the sequel be? Epps trying to bring Ferriman down or Ferriman (or somebody else) trying to take the souls of another group of people? They would have to come up with one monster twist to make the sequel any different from the original. Ferriman should be gone shouldn't he? I mean the guy failed at his mission, the ship sunk the souls escaped. He only managed to deliver half of them if that many. |
|
|
|
Post by anaconda976 on Apr 22, 2006 15:36:08 GMT -5
I don't know. I remember thinking that I really liked the movie the first time I saw it but going over it a second time I found that it was really empty. Maybe it was just the kills that got me the first time (the wire gag at the beginning was just fucking genius). So what would the sequel be? Epps trying to bring Ferriman down or Ferriman (or somebody else) trying to take the souls of another group of people? They would have to come up with one monster twist to make the sequel any different from the original. Ferriman should be gone shouldn't he? I mean the guy failed at his mission, the ship sunk the souls escaped. I don't know maybe he managed to recapture a few of them before they all fluttered away. Or "management" felt a little forgiving and decided to grant him a second opportunity. |
|
|
|
Post by ravendjinn on Apr 23, 2006 1:41:44 GMT -5
curses...hail satan!
|
|
|
|
Post by elmstreetnightmare on Apr 23, 2006 23:04:20 GMT -5
'Ghost Ship' isn't popular enough to warrant a sequel. To do a sequel you need to be absolutely sure you have drawing power. 'Ghost Ship 2' would have little to none.
Elm Street Nightmare
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr.HoRrOr on Apr 26, 2006 14:59:43 GMT -5
Ferriman should be gone shouldn't he? I mean the guy failed at his mission, the ship sunk the souls escaped. I don't know maybe he managed to recapture a few of them before they all fluttered away. Or "management" felt a little forgiving and decided to grant him a second opportunity. Remember Ferriman said souls without sin can't be marked, and that makes them tough to control. Since alot of folks on that boat had commited sins Ferriman probably had little to no problem getting all of the souls he lost back after Epps blew the ship. |
|
|
|
Post by sadakosamurai on May 6, 2009 16:50:12 GMT -5
"Ghost Ship 2" would be cool if it were based around the Ferriman character.
|
|
|
|
Post by Slasherfan on May 18, 2009 17:46:22 GMT -5
It would have to be based around him.
|
|
