|
May 2
Feb 5, 2006 16:40:49 GMT -5
Post by elmstreetnightmare on Feb 5, 2006 16:40:49 GMT -5
A sequel to 'May' isn't really needed. The ending says she found her a "friend" and lived happily ever after. Whether the "thing" she created really did touch her face or it was a figment of her imagination, thats up to the viewer to determine.
Elm Street Nightmare
|
|
|
May 2
Feb 9, 2006 17:50:02 GMT -5
Post by Dead2night on Feb 9, 2006 17:50:02 GMT -5
A sequel to 'May' isn't really needed. The ending says she found her a "friend" and lived happily ever after. Whether the "thing" she created really did touch her face or it was a figment of her imagination, thats up to the viewer to determine. Elm Street NightmareThat is true but there are still folks out there like me who want to know for sure.
|
|
|
May 2
Mar 27, 2006 15:56:39 GMT -5
Post by anaconda976 on Mar 27, 2006 15:56:39 GMT -5
"May" is fine as a lone standing movie.
|
|
|
May 2
Apr 6, 2006 18:58:10 GMT -5
Post by Mr.HoRrOr on Apr 6, 2006 18:58:10 GMT -5
A sequel to 'May' isn't really needed. The ending says she found her a "friend" and lived happily ever after. Whether the "thing" she created really did touch her face or it was a figment of her imagination, thats up to the viewer to determine. Elm Street NightmareThat is true but there are still folks out there like me who want to know for sure. I'd like to know myself but I really doubt a sequel to "May" will happen so I'm not holding my breath.
|
|
|
May 2
Apr 26, 2006 18:24:01 GMT -5
Post by elmstreetnightmare on Apr 26, 2006 18:24:01 GMT -5
A sequel to 'May' isn't really needed. The ending says she found her a "friend" and lived happily ever after. Whether the "thing" she created really did touch her face or it was a figment of her imagination, thats up to the viewer to determine. Elm Street NightmareThat is true but there are still folks out there like me who want to know for sure. You could always write a fan fiction. Elm Street Nightmare
|
|
|
May 2
Aug 26, 2008 7:54:58 GMT -5
Post by Just a Horror Fan on Aug 26, 2008 7:54:58 GMT -5
I think a sequel to May could work. But it would have to be a totally different movie. They'd have to call it Amy, after the creature. May is dead, there's no question that she's dead. It would have to be all about the creature. The creature could very well be a Frankenstein type monster who doesn't try to kill people and people hate it because it's different or something. What I think would be even better is if it's a comedy-horror that continues on Halloween Night with Amy stumbling down the street. People might honestly think it's a person in a Halloween costume.
Now THAT is what a call a hook for a sequel!!! Or a spin-off horror movie (like 1985's Return of the Living Dead was to 1968's Night of the Living Dead).
Anyway, what I think would be best is to change the tone of Amy from May. May was kind of dramatic and sad and tragic and serious. Amy should be dark... but kind of funny. Stark is better than silly or comedic. You know who might make an excellent director for the sequel? John McNaughton. He directed a movie called The Borrower and it's a lot like this idea for Amy. A creature that walks around with different people's body parts on. But he talked. So Amy shouldn't talk. It would be like combining The Borrower with Halloween 5. Remember the scene when Michael Myers picked up Tina in her boyfriend's car and he didn't speak back to her? Anyone who walked up to Amy might accidentally be killed.
I don't know how that would happen but... Maybe someone might give Amy a beer in a bottle and she'll drop it and try to pick up the broken bottle and accidentally cut someone with it. Or, like Frankenstein's monster, she might see a little kid and accidentally kill him/her somehow... That would make sense. but again- this just can't be a sad movie like May was. That's another reason I brought up The Borrower. The movie wasn't really funny, but it wasn't that serious either. A great observational type horror movie. Amy could carry on that tradition.
|
|
|
May 2
Aug 26, 2008 16:52:46 GMT -5
Post by stuntmanmike on Aug 26, 2008 16:52:46 GMT -5
Are you sure May's dead? She didn't look dead to me. It seemed at the end of the movie that maybe she just fell asleep or passed out.
|
|
|
May 2
Aug 30, 2008 11:12:24 GMT -5
Post by Just a Horror Fan on Aug 30, 2008 11:12:24 GMT -5
Well, she stabbed herself in the head with a pair of scissors, went in pretty deep, tore out her eyeball...
No I'm no Doctor, but... I'm not sure a person could really survive that without immediate medical attention. If she did pass out, I doubt she's waking up. She'd probably bleed to death.
|
|
|
May 2
Sept 6, 2008 2:02:12 GMT -5
Post by Dead2night on Sept 6, 2008 2:02:12 GMT -5
Maybe she is dead. But in horror films, the antagonist or anti-hero is always written to be able to survive anything. So who knows.
|
|
|
May 2
Sept 20, 2008 0:51:29 GMT -5
Post by wonksyawlalli on Sept 20, 2008 0:51:29 GMT -5
I think a sequel to May could work. But it would have to be a totally different movie. They'd have to call it Amy, after the creature. May is dead, there's no question that she's dead. It would have to be all about the creature. The creature could very well be a Frankenstein type monster who doesn't try to kill people and people hate it because it's different or something. What I think would be even better is if it's a comedy-horror that continues on Halloween Night with Amy stumbling down the street. People might honestly think it's a person in a Halloween costume. Now THAT is what a call a hook for a sequel!!! Or a spin-off horror movie (like 1985's Return of the Living Dead was to 1968's Night of the Living Dead). Anyway, what I think would be best is to change the tone of Amy from May. May was kind of dramatic and sad and tragic and serious. Amy should be dark... but kind of funny. Stark is better than silly or comedic. You know who might make an excellent director for the sequel? John McNaughton. He directed a movie called The Borrower and it's a lot like this idea for Amy. A creature that walks around with different people's body parts on. But he talked. So Amy shouldn't talk. It would be like combining The Borrower with Halloween 5. Remember the scene when Michael Myers picked up Tina in her boyfriend's car and he didn't speak back to her? Anyone who walked up to Amy might accidentally be killed. I don't know how that would happen but... Maybe someone might give Amy a beer in a bottle and she'll drop it and try to pick up the broken bottle and accidentally cut someone with it. Or, like Frankenstein's monster, she might see a little kid and accidentally kill him/her somehow... That would make sense. but again- this just can't be a sad movie like May was. That's another reason I brought up The Borrower. The movie wasn't really funny, but it wasn't that serious either. A great observational type horror movie. Amy could carry on that tradition. That's an interesting idea. But I think unless Amy meets someone equally as morbid as May was, the minute she came into contact with any human being, it'd be a huge circus where the cops would eventually show up and shoot Amy full of holes.
|
|