|
|
Post by flavorofthew33k on Jun 6, 2008 19:42:31 GMT -5
New Line should really make "Snakes on a plane 2". Not "Snakes on a train" which that low rent Asylum company made ----- but a real sequel. It would be so awesome!
|
|
|
|
Post by ChuckyssonGlen on Jun 6, 2008 23:38:33 GMT -5
As much as I loved "SOAP", I wouldn't dig a sequel. You can only see this sort of thing as a formula once and have it actually work. A second time would just be redundant.
|
|
|
|
Post by Slasherfan on Jun 8, 2008 0:14:52 GMT -5
^ I agree. The formula that made "SOAP" so humorous, and at the same time entertaining wouldn't work a second time around. It's a true one-time deal.
|
|
|
|
Post by toxicslasher on Jun 8, 2008 17:10:28 GMT -5
It would be hard to even formulate a plot for 'snakes on a plane 2'. Eddie Kim got the gas chamber, his criminal empire were rounded up and arrested, so yeah......how could the same thing possibly happen again?
|
|
|
|
Post by anaconda976 on Jun 10, 2008 12:35:38 GMT -5
I'll watch almost any horror film with snakes in it so I say bring it on!  |
|
|
|
Post by prettyinred on Jun 11, 2008 17:37:38 GMT -5
I guess I'd be okay with 'Snakes On A Plane 2'. As long as Flynn and Shaun came back.
|
|
|
|
Post by bloodyjennifer on Jun 15, 2008 1:15:13 GMT -5
I really don't care if it's made or not. I'm split down the middle on any potential sequel.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr.HoRrOr on Jun 28, 2008 0:14:41 GMT -5
I loved "SOAP" but in all honesty lets just leave it at one mmmkay?
|
|
|
|
Post by finaldestination4u on Jul 15, 2008 13:42:09 GMT -5
No way they would ruin what "SOAP" was. Sometimes the best horror films are one hitters.
|
|
|
|
Post by toxicslasher on Jul 19, 2008 0:30:45 GMT -5
^ Agreed.
|
|
